Fido BVA Deep-Dive

Ghana — February 2026 Budget vs Actual

Data as of 2026-03-01 Generated 2026-03-01 21:36 DRAFT — Pending CFO Review
February 2026 missed budget on most metrics. The largest gap is L0 Customers at -26.5%, primarily driven by volume (fewer loans).
Portfolio quality: PAR30+ at 15.4% vs 14.7% budget (unfavorable, +0.7pp).

1. Headline Variances

GHS
MetricBudgetActual Variance
Revenue (GHS M) 41.7 36.1 -13.5%
Disbursements (GHS M) 338.1 255.1 -24.5%
Loanbook EOP (GHS M) 550.9 468.2 -15.0%
Repayments (GHS M) 327.3 267.4 -18.3%
L0 Customers 26,026 19,139 -26.5%
Loans Disbursed 173,676 131,725 -24.2%
PAR30+ 14.7% 15.4% +0.7pp
PAR90+ 6.6% 8.4% +1.8pp

The 5 Whys — Why Disbursements Missed by GHS 83.0M

The surface answer — "fewer loans" — is circular. Below is the causal chain, each level backed by data.

Disbursements missed by GHS 83M because 41,951 fewer loans were disbursed (131.7K vs 173.7K budget), while average ticket was virtually unchanged (GHS 1,937 vs 1,947). Decomposition: 98% volume effect (−GHS 81.7M), 2% size effect (−GHS 1.7M).
42K fewer loans were disbursed because total applications fell to 170.5K — down 6.6% from Jan's 182.6K and ~15% below the ~200K implied by budget. Both pipelines contracted: repeat apps 130.9K (vs 175K in Oct), L0 apps 39.6K (vs 48K in Oct). Approval rates were stable — the miss is demand-side.
Applications contracted when they historically rise Jan→Feb, breaking a 4-year seasonal pattern. Jan→Feb change: 2026 = −6.6%, vs 2025 = +2.2%, 2024 = +5.6%, 2023 = +4.5%. This is a ~10pp swing vs the historical average, signaling a structural demand shift.
Underlying demand is shrinking because the active portfolio entered Feb at GHS 464M — 11.2% below the budgeted GHS 523M — producing fewer maturing loans and fewer repeat application triggers. Only 113.8K loans closed in Jan → 56.7K reborrowed in Feb (49.8% reborrow rate). Repeat AR actually recovered to 86.0% (from 84.5% in Jan), so the bottleneck is demand, not credit policy.
The opening portfolio was already behind because Jan's shortfall carried forward. This is a self-reinforcing cycle: fewer disbursements → smaller EOP → lower next-month BOP → fewer maturities → fewer repeat apps. Budget waterfall: BOP 522.6 + 338.1 − 291.0 − 18.8 = EOP 550.9. Actual: 463.9 + 255.1 − 235.6 − 15.6 = 467.8. The BOP gap (−GHS 58.7M) compounds through every line.
Core finding: The Feb miss is not a single-month aberration but a self-reinforcing portfolio contraction cycle. A smaller-than-budgeted portfolio generates fewer maturing loans, which suppresses repeat demand, which widens the disbursement gap, which further shrinks the portfolio. The budget assumed a growth trajectory that hasn't materialized since Jan. Breaking this cycle requires either a step-change in L0 acquisition (currently 26.5% below plan) or a structural reset of the budget trajectory to reflect the actual BOP of ~GHS 468M.

4. Application Pipeline

BY CREATION DATE · TRAILING 6M
Month CreatedTotal Apps Repeat AppsApprovedAR L0 AppsApprovedAR
2025-09 210,449 157,280 139,246 88.5% 53,169 24,867 46.8%
2025-10 222,162 174,095 149,845 86.1% 48,067 22,919 47.7%
2025-11 199,901 153,523 134,710 87.7% 46,378 21,893 47.2%
2025-12 228,737 187,491 164,357 87.7% 41,246 16,965 41.1%
2026-01 182,589 137,406 116,116 84.5% 45,183 20,898 46.3%
2026-02 170,480 130,869 112,577 86.0% 39,611 19,138 48.3%
Note: Pipeline groups by application creation date (cohort view). Counts differ from headline disbursements which use disbursement date. Recent months may understate approvals for applications still in processing.
Reborrow rate: 56,666 / 113,795 = 49.8% (clients with loan closed in prior month who took a new loan)

8. Seasonality

Jan→Feb · 4-YEAR VIEW
PeriodJan Apps Feb AppsChange Feb AR
Jan-26 → Feb-26 182,589 170,480 -6.6% 77.3%
Jan-25 → Feb-25 154,517 157,870 +2.2% 78.7%
Jan-24 → Feb-24 134,475 141,974 +5.6% 77.3%
Jan-23 → Feb-23 94,231 98,486 +4.5% 100.2%

3. Disbursement Decomposition

VOLUME vs SIZE

Total gap: -83.4 GHS M (Budget: 338.1 → Actual: 255.1)

Volume: 173,676 → 131,725 loans (-81.7M) +98%
+98%
Ticket Size: GHS 1,947 → 1,937 (-1.7M) +2%
+2%
98% of the disbursement gap is volume (loan count)-driven. The ticket size effect is secondary (2%). Budget assumed 173,676 loans at GHS 1,947 avg; actual was 131,725 loans at GHS 1,937.

5. Repayment Decomposition

POOL vs RATE

Total gap: -62.4 GHS M (Budget: 327.3 → Actual: 267.4)

Pool Effect: avg loanbook 536.8 → 466.0 (-43.1M) +69%
+69%
Rate Effect: repay rate 61.0% → 57.4% (-19.3M) +31%
+31%
69% of the repayment shortfall is mechanical — a smaller loanbook produced a smaller repayment pool. Credit quality (rate effect) is a minor contributor.

6. Loanbook Flow

WATERFALL
ComponentBudgetActual Variance
BOP (GHS M) 522.6 463.9 -11.2%
+ Disbursements (GHS M) 338.1 255.1 -24.5%
- Repayments (GHS M) 291.0 235.6 -19.0%
- Write-offs (GHS M) 18.8 15.6 -17.0%
= EOP (GHS M) 550.9 468.2 -15.0%

7. Portfolio Quality — PAR Layers (FIN005)

COVENANT · GHS M
Layer Budget %Budget Bal Actual %Actual Bal Variance
Current 80.4% 442.9 77.0% 360.5 -3.4pp
PAR0 4.9% 27.0 7.6% 35.4 +2.7pp
PAR30 4.1% 22.6 3.6% 16.9 -0.5pp
PAR60 4.0% 22.0 3.5% 16.2 -0.5pp
PAR90 3.0% 16.5 3.7% 17.4 +0.7pp
PAR120 3.2% 17.6 4.6% 21.7 +1.4pp
PAR150 0.4% 2.2 0.0% 0.1 -0.4pp
Total 100.0% 550.9 100.0% 468.2 -82.7
PAR30+: 15.4% (budget 14.7%, +0.7pp)     PAR90+: 8.4% (budget 6.6%, +1.8pp)     Provisions: 41.7M

Root Cause Attribution — Ranked by Impact

#Root CauseMechanismEst. GHS M
1Application volume shortfall170.5K total apps vs ~200K+ implied by budget. At actual overall AR of 77%, this yields ~132K loans vs 174K budget. Both L0 and repeat pipelines below plan — demand-side, not approval rate.~−58
2Loanbook BOP deficit (compounding)BOP 463.9M vs budget 522.6M (−11.2%). Smaller active book → fewer maturities → fewer repeat triggers. This cascaded from Jan's miss and will cascade into March.~−20
3Collection rate softnessActual collection rate 57.4% vs budget 61.0% (−3.6pp). On a GHS 537M budget pool, this 3.6pp gap = ~GHS 19M less collected. Possible driver: portfolio composition shift toward shorter-tenure loans.~−19
4L0 acquisition miss19.1K L0 disbursed vs 26.0K budget (−26.5%). L0 AR is healthy at 48.3% — the miss is fewer applicants (39.6K vs budget-implied ~54K). Direct GHS impact is small (L0 avg ticket ~GHS 258) but L0s are the future repeat base.~−1.8

Implication: The budget trajectory assumes portfolio growth that hasn't materialized. March budget should be stress-tested against the actual BOP of ~GHS 468M, not the planned ~GHS 551M. L0 acquisition is the key lever to break the compounding cycle — every L0 acquired today becomes 3-4 repeat loans over the next 6 months.

Risk Watch:

9. Avg Loan Duration

TRAILING
Month DisbursedAvg Duration (Closed Loans)
2025-09 29 days
2025-10 29 days
2025-11 27 days
2025-12 27 days
2026-01 22 days (70% closed)
2026-02 13 days (21% closed)

Methodology & Data Sources

Key Definitions

"Chale" — the numbers tell the story. Let the data lead.